<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (2) TMI 48 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57896</link>
    <description>Goods enclosed in the final packed product merely to attract customers and boost sales are not goods used in the manufacture of taxable goods for sale, because they are not directly or integrally connected with the manufacturing process. On that construction of section 25 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, the assessee&#039;s claim failed. The earlier Tribunal decision applying the same statutory test was not shown to rest on any erroneous principle and did not require reconsideration, so it was treated as good law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (2) TMI 48 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57896</link>
      <description>Goods enclosed in the final packed product merely to attract customers and boost sales are not goods used in the manufacture of taxable goods for sale, because they are not directly or integrally connected with the manufacturing process. On that construction of section 25 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, the assessee&#039;s claim failed. The earlier Tribunal decision applying the same statutory test was not shown to rest on any erroneous principle and did not require reconsideration, so it was treated as good law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>