<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 48 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57873</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction for payments made under the voluntary retirement scheme. The tribunal found no evidence of cessation of business, emphasizing the unity in various aspects of the business activities. It dismissed suspicions regarding fabricated bills and relied on financial records to support the continuity of business. Referring to legal precedents, the ITAT highlighted the commercial expediency and business nature of the expenditure, ultimately distinguishing and rejecting the revenue&#039;s arguments. The judgment provides a detailed analysis supporting the decision to allow the deduction for voluntary retirement scheme payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:01:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 48 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57873</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction for payments made under the voluntary retirement scheme. The tribunal found no evidence of cessation of business, emphasizing the unity in various aspects of the business activities. It dismissed suspicions regarding fabricated bills and relied on financial records to support the continuity of business. Referring to legal precedents, the ITAT highlighted the commercial expediency and business nature of the expenditure, ultimately distinguishing and rejecting the revenue&#039;s arguments. The judgment provides a detailed analysis supporting the decision to allow the deduction for voluntary retirement scheme payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>