<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 126 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee&#039;s entitlement to investment allowance for the machinery used in manufacturing potato chips. The Tribunal concluded that the process of making potato chips amounted to manufacturing as the original commodity (potato) was entirely transformed into a new and distinct item (potato chips), supporting the assessee&#039;s claim for investment allowance under section 32A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 126 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee&#039;s entitlement to investment allowance for the machinery used in manufacturing potato chips. The Tribunal concluded that the process of making potato chips amounted to manufacturing as the original commodity (potato) was entirely transformed into a new and distinct item (potato chips), supporting the assessee&#039;s claim for investment allowance under section 32A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>