<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 67 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57856</link>
    <description>A transfer made under a trust deed in exercise of a pre-existing right of purchase was examined for deemed gift treatment under the Gift-tax Act. Section 4(1)(b) was held inapplicable because the stipulated consideration did pass from transferee to transferor. For section 4(1)(a), adequacy of consideration had to be assessed in a broad, common-sense manner, and the existence of a binding obligation under the trust deed was relevant to that assessment. The market value being higher did not by itself make the consideration inadequate, and voluntariness was not to be imported into the deemed-gift provision. On those facts, no deemed gift arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:18:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 67 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57856</link>
      <description>A transfer made under a trust deed in exercise of a pre-existing right of purchase was examined for deemed gift treatment under the Gift-tax Act. Section 4(1)(b) was held inapplicable because the stipulated consideration did pass from transferee to transferor. For section 4(1)(a), adequacy of consideration had to be assessed in a broad, common-sense manner, and the existence of a binding obligation under the trust deed was relevant to that assessment. The market value being higher did not by itself make the consideration inadequate, and voluntariness was not to be imported into the deemed-gift provision. On those facts, no deemed gift arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>