<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 258 - ITAT BANGALORE-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57854</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the transaction as a slump sale, thereby exempting it from individual asset taxation. The AO was instructed to compute capital gains liability based on the entire undertaking&#039;s transfer, following jurisdictional High Court guidance. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed with specific directions for assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 258 - ITAT BANGALORE-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57854</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the transaction as a slump sale, thereby exempting it from individual asset taxation. The AO was instructed to compute capital gains liability based on the entire undertaking&#039;s transfer, following jurisdictional High Court guidance. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed with specific directions for assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>