<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 281 - ITAT BANGALORE-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57842</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessees were allowed, and all additions made by the AO were deleted. The Tribunal found that the AO failed to properly examine objections, provide opportunities for cross-examination, relied on unregistered valuation reports, and lacked incriminating evidence to support the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:03:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 281 - ITAT BANGALORE-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57842</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessees were allowed, and all additions made by the AO were deleted. The Tribunal found that the AO failed to properly examine objections, provide opportunities for cross-examination, relied on unregistered valuation reports, and lacked incriminating evidence to support the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>