<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 177 - ITAT BANGALORE-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57840</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed in part, directing the Assessing Officer to revalue the properties based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings and using suitable methods and rates for various valuation dates. The objection regarding the number of co-owners considered for assessment was upheld, instructing the inclusion of 1/4th share for each assessee. The Tribunal directed the application of Schedule III of the Wealth Tax Act for revaluation on a specific date and allowed a 10% rebate for joint ownership. The reopening of assessment for certain years was upheld, and the claim to exclude a property from valuation due to commercial status was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:55:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 177 - ITAT BANGALORE-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57840</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed in part, directing the Assessing Officer to revalue the properties based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings and using suitable methods and rates for various valuation dates. The objection regarding the number of co-owners considered for assessment was upheld, instructing the inclusion of 1/4th share for each assessee. The Tribunal directed the application of Schedule III of the Wealth Tax Act for revaluation on a specific date and allowed a 10% rebate for joint ownership. The reopening of assessment for certain years was upheld, and the claim to exclude a property from valuation due to commercial status was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>