<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 261 - ITAT BANGALORE-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57834</link>
    <description>The ITAT quashed the impugned order by the DIT(Ex.) due to its issuance beyond the statutory six-month period, rendering it &quot;non est in law.&quot; The Tribunal accepted the rectified appeal, dismissing defects in filing, and directed that registration u/s 12A be deemed granted, instructing the AO to proceed accordingly. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 261 - ITAT BANGALORE-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57834</link>
      <description>The ITAT quashed the impugned order by the DIT(Ex.) due to its issuance beyond the statutory six-month period, rendering it &quot;non est in law.&quot; The Tribunal accepted the rectified appeal, dismissing defects in filing, and directed that registration u/s 12A be deemed granted, instructing the AO to proceed accordingly. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>