<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 319 - ITAT BANGALORE-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, determining that the disallowance under section 40A(3) was unjustified as the payment was made directly to the bank account of the recipient, ensuring traceability. Interest charged under section 234B was deleted since the assessee&#039;s declared income was below the threshold for advance tax payment. However, interest under section 234A was upheld due to the late filing of the tax return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 319 - ITAT BANGALORE-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, determining that the disallowance under section 40A(3) was unjustified as the payment was made directly to the bank account of the recipient, ensuring traceability. Interest charged under section 234B was deleted since the assessee&#039;s declared income was below the threshold for advance tax payment. However, interest under section 234A was upheld due to the late filing of the tax return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>