<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 304 - ITAT BANGALORE-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57799</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263. It held that the revision for the assessment year 1993-94 was not time-barred, but the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction under section 263. The Tribunal found no prejudice to Revenue as the interest income was taxed in subsequent years. Additionally, it determined that the broken period interest on securities had not accrued to the assessee based on the Income-tax Act provisions, ultimately allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:35:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 304 - ITAT BANGALORE-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57799</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263. It held that the revision for the assessment year 1993-94 was not time-barred, but the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction under section 263. The Tribunal found no prejudice to Revenue as the interest income was taxed in subsequent years. Additionally, it determined that the broken period interest on securities had not accrued to the assessee based on the Income-tax Act provisions, ultimately allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>