<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 196 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57765</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 2,95,000 sustained by the CIT(A) for the assessment year 1992-93, finding that the assessee adequately explained the sources of funds for construction expenses. The appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the additions made by the AO and partially sustained by the CIT(A) were not upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 196 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57765</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 2,95,000 sustained by the CIT(A) for the assessment year 1992-93, finding that the assessee adequately explained the sources of funds for construction expenses. The appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the additions made by the AO and partially sustained by the CIT(A) were not upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>