<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 106 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57754</link>
    <description>The departmental appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed. The CIT(A)&#039;s deletions of additional amounts and the examination of undisclosed investment in the moneylending business were upheld by the tribunal. Specific directions were given for verification, limiting potential relief to the assessee to Rs. 2,37,035.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:48:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 106 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57754</link>
      <description>The departmental appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed. The CIT(A)&#039;s deletions of additional amounts and the examination of undisclosed investment in the moneylending business were upheld by the tribunal. Specific directions were given for verification, limiting potential relief to the assessee to Rs. 2,37,035.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>