<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 99 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57740</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the assessee, a private limited company, allowing the claim for depreciation on revalued cost. The dispute arose from the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) disallowing the depreciation claim based on the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the distribution of assets on dissolution did not constitute a transfer, citing various Supreme Court judgments. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the revalued cost could be considered for depreciation purposes, and Explanation 3 to section 43(1) was deemed inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:09:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 99 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57740</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the assessee, a private limited company, allowing the claim for depreciation on revalued cost. The dispute arose from the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) disallowing the depreciation claim based on the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the distribution of assets on dissolution did not constitute a transfer, citing various Supreme Court judgments. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the revalued cost could be considered for depreciation purposes, and Explanation 3 to section 43(1) was deemed inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>