<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 148 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57737</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the loss incurred by the trust cannot be claimed by the beneficiary for set-off purposes. The assessment procedures for trusts and beneficiaries are distinct, and once an election is made, the consequences must follow accordingly. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and Income Tax Officer regarding the computation of the minor beneficiary&#039;s income in the Sulochana Family Trust.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:02:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 148 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57737</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the loss incurred by the trust cannot be claimed by the beneficiary for set-off purposes. The assessment procedures for trusts and beneficiaries are distinct, and once an election is made, the consequences must follow accordingly. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and Income Tax Officer regarding the computation of the minor beneficiary&#039;s income in the Sulochana Family Trust.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>