<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 119 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57725</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) is not sustainable where the assessee has disclosed all material facts, given an explanation for cash credits, and the explanation is not shown to be false after enquiry. On these facts, mere inability to further substantiate the explanation does not trigger deemed concealment under Explanation 1 when the proviso applies. The cancellation of the penalty followed because the addition, by itself, did not establish concealment or deemed concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 119 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57725</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) is not sustainable where the assessee has disclosed all material facts, given an explanation for cash credits, and the explanation is not shown to be false after enquiry. On these facts, mere inability to further substantiate the explanation does not trigger deemed concealment under Explanation 1 when the proviso applies. The cancellation of the penalty followed because the addition, by itself, did not establish concealment or deemed concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>