<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (5) TMI 41 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57709</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the reopening of assessments for the assessee. It was determined that the valuation report used to justify the reassessments did not constitute definitive information for reopening assessments. The Tribunal concluded that the reassessment based on the later valuation report was a change of opinion by the assessing officer rather than a case of wealth escaped assessment or under-assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:12:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (5) TMI 41 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57709</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the reopening of assessments for the assessee. It was determined that the valuation report used to justify the reassessments did not constitute definitive information for reopening assessments. The Tribunal concluded that the reassessment based on the later valuation report was a change of opinion by the assessing officer rather than a case of wealth escaped assessment or under-assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>