<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (7) TMI 76 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57656</link>
    <description>In rectification proceedings, the substance of a notice prevails over its caption: a notice referring to an earlier assessment, a retrospective tax amendment, and proposed alteration of the assessment was treated as one under the rectification provision, not as an escaped-assessment notice. The opportunity of hearing requirement was satisfied by inviting written objections and considering the response, as a personal oral hearing is not always necessary. In revision, the authority&#039;s jurisdiction was confined to the legality and propriety of the order on the existing record, so it could not investigate a later refund claim that was not before the assessing authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (7) TMI 76 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57656</link>
      <description>In rectification proceedings, the substance of a notice prevails over its caption: a notice referring to an earlier assessment, a retrospective tax amendment, and proposed alteration of the assessment was treated as one under the rectification provision, not as an escaped-assessment notice. The opportunity of hearing requirement was satisfied by inviting written objections and considering the response, as a personal oral hearing is not always necessary. In revision, the authority&#039;s jurisdiction was confined to the legality and propriety of the order on the existing record, so it could not investigate a later refund claim that was not before the assessing authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>