<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 133 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57582</link>
    <description>In estate duty valuation, jewellery must be valued at the rate prevailing on the date of death, and a certified rate from the Jewellers Association was accepted as the proper basis. For aggregation under section 34(1)(c), the lineal descendants&#039; share in HUF property is to be determined through the statutory mechanism in section 39, applying the fiction of a total partition immediately before death. On that basis, only shares of lineal descendants are aggregable; the shares allotted to the sons&#039; wives are excluded because they are not lineal descendants. The question of interest under rule 42 was remitted for reconsideration, and the principal value was to be recomputed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 133 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57582</link>
      <description>In estate duty valuation, jewellery must be valued at the rate prevailing on the date of death, and a certified rate from the Jewellers Association was accepted as the proper basis. For aggregation under section 34(1)(c), the lineal descendants&#039; share in HUF property is to be determined through the statutory mechanism in section 39, applying the fiction of a total partition immediately before death. On that basis, only shares of lineal descendants are aggregable; the shares allotted to the sons&#039; wives are excluded because they are not lineal descendants. The question of interest under rule 42 was remitted for reconsideration, and the principal value was to be recomputed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>