<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (12) TMI 85 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57575</link>
    <description>Revisional jurisdiction under the surtax provisions does not arise merely because a revisional order contains errors in describing the assessee or mixing account figures; such defects may show an incorrect approach rather than no application of mind. For a foreign company, capital base is computed from head-office accounts. Retained earnings included within other reserves qualify as reserves rather than unallocated profits, and a reserve connected with scientific research expenditure remains includible despite income-tax allowance of the underlying expenditure. As the original assessments were neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue on these grounds, the revisional order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:26:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (12) TMI 85 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57575</link>
      <description>Revisional jurisdiction under the surtax provisions does not arise merely because a revisional order contains errors in describing the assessee or mixing account figures; such defects may show an incorrect approach rather than no application of mind. For a foreign company, capital base is computed from head-office accounts. Retained earnings included within other reserves qualify as reserves rather than unallocated profits, and a reserve connected with scientific research expenditure remains includible despite income-tax allowance of the underlying expenditure. As the original assessments were neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue on these grounds, the revisional order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>