<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 39 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57542</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the order passed under section 154 was time-barred as it exceeded the four-year limitation period from the date of the original assessment order. The rectification order was deemed invalid and subsequently cancelled. Additionally, the tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to interest under section 244(1A) on the excess refund, dismissing the revenue&#039;s argument against it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:55:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 39 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57542</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the order passed under section 154 was time-barred as it exceeded the four-year limitation period from the date of the original assessment order. The rectification order was deemed invalid and subsequently cancelled. Additionally, the tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to interest under section 244(1A) on the excess refund, dismissing the revenue&#039;s argument against it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>