<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 118 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57530</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s method for computing engineering fees, allowing the full deduction under section 80-O without attributing Indian expenses, and differentiating between capital and revenue expenses based on the nature of the work. The unexplained credit issue was resolved in favor of the assessee, and the grounds for interest under section 234B were dismissed as they pertained to consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:28:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 118 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57530</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s method for computing engineering fees, allowing the full deduction under section 80-O without attributing Indian expenses, and differentiating between capital and revenue expenses based on the nature of the work. The unexplained credit issue was resolved in favor of the assessee, and the grounds for interest under section 234B were dismissed as they pertained to consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>