<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 98 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the assessment due to the invalid notice served beyond the limitation period under section 143(2). The disallowance of interest on borrowed capital was overturned, allowing the assessee to adjust interest earned against interest paid. The charging of interest under sections 234A, 234B, etc., was deemed consequential and not applicable following the assessment cancellation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:22:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 98 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the assessment due to the invalid notice served beyond the limitation period under section 143(2). The disallowance of interest on borrowed capital was overturned, allowing the assessee to adjust interest earned against interest paid. The charging of interest under sections 234A, 234B, etc., was deemed consequential and not applicable following the assessment cancellation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>