<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 168 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57522</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the exemption under section 40(3)(vi) of the Finance Act, 1983, as the hotel building was used for business purposes, fulfilling the conditions for exemption. The CWT&#039;s order under section 25(2) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, was canceled, and the original assessments were restored. The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 168 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57522</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the exemption under section 40(3)(vi) of the Finance Act, 1983, as the hotel building was used for business purposes, fulfilling the conditions for exemption. The CWT&#039;s order under section 25(2) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, was canceled, and the original assessments were restored. The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>