<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 167 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57521</link>
    <description>The penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for amounts totaling Rs. 8,40,000, Rs. 6,29,170, and Rs. 5,41,484 for three respective years were canceled. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the accounts but concluded that the Department failed to provide sufficient evidence of income concealment. The penalties were annulled, and the appeals by the assessee were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:59:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 167 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57521</link>
      <description>The penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for amounts totaling Rs. 8,40,000, Rs. 6,29,170, and Rs. 5,41,484 for three respective years were canceled. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the accounts but concluded that the Department failed to provide sufficient evidence of income concealment. The penalties were annulled, and the appeals by the assessee were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>