<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 169 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57516</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the allowability of payments made to McDowell, interest payments, and sales-tax liability. The matter of depreciation claims was remitted back to the AO for factual verification. The Tribunal concluded that the expenses were incurred for genuine business purposes and were allowable under the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 169 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57516</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the allowability of payments made to McDowell, interest payments, and sales-tax liability. The matter of depreciation claims was remitted back to the AO for factual verification. The Tribunal concluded that the expenses were incurred for genuine business purposes and were allowable under the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>