<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 124 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57496</link>
    <description>Employer provident fund contributions remitted before the end of the accounting year were treated as not disallowable under section 43B because no liability remained outstanding at year-end. Employees&#039; provident fund contributions deducted from salaries remained deductible under section 36(1)(va) where credited within the recognised five-day grace period allowed under the applicable provident fund scheme and circulars. Payment within that period was regarded as substantive compliance with the due-date requirement, despite remittance after the exact monthly due date. Both additions were therefore deleted, applying a practical and purposive approach to provident fund remittance deadlines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 124 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57496</link>
      <description>Employer provident fund contributions remitted before the end of the accounting year were treated as not disallowable under section 43B because no liability remained outstanding at year-end. Employees&#039; provident fund contributions deducted from salaries remained deductible under section 36(1)(va) where credited within the recognised five-day grace period allowed under the applicable provident fund scheme and circulars. Payment within that period was regarded as substantive compliance with the due-date requirement, despite remittance after the exact monthly due date. Both additions were therefore deleted, applying a practical and purposive approach to provident fund remittance deadlines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>