<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 58 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57488</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) on the theatre maintenance expenses, deeming it as income concealment. However, the penalty was not upheld for vehicle maintenance expenses. The penalty was based on the theatre maintenance amount, with the tax on this sum considered as evaded tax. The penalty was imposed at a minimal level, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed in this regard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:55:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 58 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57488</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) on the theatre maintenance expenses, deeming it as income concealment. However, the penalty was not upheld for vehicle maintenance expenses. The penalty was based on the theatre maintenance amount, with the tax on this sum considered as evaded tax. The penalty was imposed at a minimal level, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed in this regard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>