<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 108 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57486</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the benefit of carry-forward of loss despite filing the return one day after the specified date. The Tribunal interpreted the expression &quot;before 30-6-1986&quot; to include the specified date, emphasizing legislative intent and rejecting a strict interpretation. The decision, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling, serves as a precedent for similar cases, emphasizing the importance of considering legislative intent in statutory interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 108 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57486</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the benefit of carry-forward of loss despite filing the return one day after the specified date. The Tribunal interpreted the expression &quot;before 30-6-1986&quot; to include the specified date, emphasizing legislative intent and rejecting a strict interpretation. The decision, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling, serves as a precedent for similar cases, emphasizing the importance of considering legislative intent in statutory interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>