<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 137 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that penalties under section 271(1)(c) were unjustified as the revised returns were valid and no income concealment was found. The penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer were canceled, and the appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:39:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 137 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that penalties under section 271(1)(c) were unjustified as the revised returns were valid and no income concealment was found. The penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer were canceled, and the appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>