<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 132 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the assessee qualifies as an industrial company primarily engaged in manufacturing activities. Income from lease rent and interest, considered side incomes, did not change the primary engagement in manufacturing. The Tribunal relied on the CBDT circular and case law to support this finding, overturning the CIT&#039;s orders under section 263 and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:28:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 132 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the assessee qualifies as an industrial company primarily engaged in manufacturing activities. Income from lease rent and interest, considered side incomes, did not change the primary engagement in manufacturing. The Tribunal relied on the CBDT circular and case law to support this finding, overturning the CIT&#039;s orders under section 263 and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>