<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 104 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CWT(A) and dismissed departmental appeals, ruling that income-tax refunds cannot be considered assets for wealth-tax purposes until determined by the taxing authority. The excess advance tax paid was not deemed an asset, following the Gujarat and Rajasthan High Courts&#039; decisions. The Tribunal emphasized that the mere possibility of receiving an income-tax refund does not constitute an asset in wealth-tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:18:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 104 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CWT(A) and dismissed departmental appeals, ruling that income-tax refunds cannot be considered assets for wealth-tax purposes until determined by the taxing authority. The excess advance tax paid was not deemed an asset, following the Gujarat and Rajasthan High Courts&#039; decisions. The Tribunal emphasized that the mere possibility of receiving an income-tax refund does not constitute an asset in wealth-tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>