<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 83 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57474</link>
    <description>For continuation or cancellation of an already registered firm under section 186(1) of the Income-tax Act, the decisive inquiry is whether the firm was not genuine during the relevant previous year. Mere alleged illegality in the underlying business is insufficient unless it is accompanied by a finding that the firm was sham or bogus. The commentary notes that the firm had earlier been granted registration, had filed Form No. 12 for continuation, and there was no change in constitution. As no authority recorded a finding that the firm was not genuine, refusal to continue registration was unsustainable, and the firm remained entitled to registered-firm status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:15:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 83 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57474</link>
      <description>For continuation or cancellation of an already registered firm under section 186(1) of the Income-tax Act, the decisive inquiry is whether the firm was not genuine during the relevant previous year. Mere alleged illegality in the underlying business is insufficient unless it is accompanied by a finding that the firm was sham or bogus. The commentary notes that the firm had earlier been granted registration, had filed Form No. 12 for continuation, and there was no change in constitution. As no authority recorded a finding that the firm was not genuine, refusal to continue registration was unsustainable, and the firm remained entitled to registered-firm status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>