<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (12) TMI 83 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that for the purpose of Section 115J(1A)(iv), the term &#039;loss&#039; must include &#039;depreciation,&#039; and the &#039;loss&#039; should be understood as the loss after charging depreciation to the accounts. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to recompute the income under Section 115J accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:11:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (12) TMI 83 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that for the purpose of Section 115J(1A)(iv), the term &#039;loss&#039; must include &#039;depreciation,&#039; and the &#039;loss&#039; should be understood as the loss after charging depreciation to the accounts. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to recompute the income under Section 115J accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>