<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 181 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57448</link>
    <description>In wealth-tax proceedings, the need for a reference to the Valuation Cell under section 16A is for the Wealth-tax Officer to determine on the basis of the material on record, and an appellate direction to make such a reference was treated as premature. Shares standing in the mother&#039;s name were includible in the Hindu undivided family&#039;s wealth where they were treated by compromise decree as family property. On succession to a coparcener&#039;s interest, the share devolving on Class I female heirs ceases to form part of the Hindu undivided family, but appellate interference cannot place the Revenue in a worse position where only the assessee appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:13:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 181 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57448</link>
      <description>In wealth-tax proceedings, the need for a reference to the Valuation Cell under section 16A is for the Wealth-tax Officer to determine on the basis of the material on record, and an appellate direction to make such a reference was treated as premature. Shares standing in the mother&#039;s name were includible in the Hindu undivided family&#039;s wealth where they were treated by compromise decree as family property. On succession to a coparcener&#039;s interest, the share devolving on Class I female heirs ceases to form part of the Hindu undivided family, but appellate interference cannot place the Revenue in a worse position where only the assessee appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>