<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 93 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57424</link>
    <description>Investment allowance under section 32A was available where a computer used in data processing generated processed printouts treated as an article or thing produced. The wider expression &quot;production&quot; was applied, so the activity did not need to amount to manufacture in the strict sense. Because the computer was used in an industrial undertaking to produce the processed output, the statutory condition was satisfied and the assessee was entitled to the allowance claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:22:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 93 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57424</link>
      <description>Investment allowance under section 32A was available where a computer used in data processing generated processed printouts treated as an article or thing produced. The wider expression &quot;production&quot; was applied, so the activity did not need to amount to manufacture in the strict sense. Because the computer was used in an industrial undertaking to produce the processed output, the statutory condition was satisfied and the assessee was entitled to the allowance claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>