<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 62 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that certain payments, including house rent allowance and personal accident insurance premium, were not &#039;perquisites&#039; under section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and thus excluded from the disallowance calculation. Provident fund and gratuity contributions were deemed to fall under a different provision, warranting further examination. The Tribunal applied section 40A(5) over section 40(c), favoring the assessee and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:41:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 62 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that certain payments, including house rent allowance and personal accident insurance premium, were not &#039;perquisites&#039; under section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and thus excluded from the disallowance calculation. Provident fund and gratuity contributions were deemed to fall under a different provision, warranting further examination. The Tribunal applied section 40A(5) over section 40(c), favoring the assessee and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>