<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 90 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, confirming the application of rule 1BB for property valuation under the Wealth-tax Act. It emphasized the necessity of adhering to prescribed rules for valuation, reinstating the assessments to the WTO for valuation in accordance with rule 1BB. The decision underscored the importance of following procedural guidelines unless specific exceptions are met, rejecting the argument to disregard rule 1BB based on lower valuations than market rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:21:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 90 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, confirming the application of rule 1BB for property valuation under the Wealth-tax Act. It emphasized the necessity of adhering to prescribed rules for valuation, reinstating the assessments to the WTO for valuation in accordance with rule 1BB. The decision underscored the importance of following procedural guidelines unless specific exceptions are met, rejecting the argument to disregard rule 1BB based on lower valuations than market rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>