<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 76 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and allowed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the rectification under section 155(2) to include the assessee&#039;s share of income from the property in the assessment year 1968-69. The Tribunal held that the ITO&#039;s jurisdiction under section 155(2) was valid, as the reduction in the BOI&#039;s income necessitated the inclusion of rental income in individual co-owners&#039; assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 18:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 76 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and allowed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the rectification under section 155(2) to include the assessee&#039;s share of income from the property in the assessment year 1968-69. The Tribunal held that the ITO&#039;s jurisdiction under section 155(2) was valid, as the reduction in the BOI&#039;s income necessitated the inclusion of rental income in individual co-owners&#039; assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>