<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (11) TMI 63 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57361</link>
    <description>Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, where the deceased coparcener leaves a widow and son, requires a notional partition immediately before death to ascertain his share; succession, not survivorship, governs that interest and it devolves on the heirs as tenants-in-common. The Hindu undivided family continues only with the surviving coparceners and the reduced remaining share stays within the family property for wealth-tax purposes. On that basis, the deceased&#039;s defined share could not be included in the Hindu undivided family&#039;s net wealth, and a revisional direction to assess the entire family wealth was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:34:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (11) TMI 63 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57361</link>
      <description>Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, where the deceased coparcener leaves a widow and son, requires a notional partition immediately before death to ascertain his share; succession, not survivorship, governs that interest and it devolves on the heirs as tenants-in-common. The Hindu undivided family continues only with the surviving coparceners and the reduced remaining share stays within the family property for wealth-tax purposes. On that basis, the deceased&#039;s defined share could not be included in the Hindu undivided family&#039;s net wealth, and a revisional direction to assess the entire family wealth was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>