<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 205 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57344</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 36,46,610. The Tribunal found that the shares were held as investments, and no capital gain could be taxed solely on the receipt of bonus shares without an actual transfer of the capital asset, as per section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Since there was no transfer in the relevant year, the Tribunal held that no capital gain accrued to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:51:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 205 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57344</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 36,46,610. The Tribunal found that the shares were held as investments, and no capital gain could be taxed solely on the receipt of bonus shares without an actual transfer of the capital asset, as per section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Since there was no transfer in the relevant year, the Tribunal held that no capital gain accrued to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>