<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 165 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57333</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, providing relief on the additions related to material supplied by the contractee Department and interest on refund. The Tribunal remanded the issue of interest on FDRs for further reconciliation and upheld the addition for the closing stock of work-in-progress with directions to avoid double taxation in the subsequent year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 165 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57333</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, providing relief on the additions related to material supplied by the contractee Department and interest on refund. The Tribunal remanded the issue of interest on FDRs for further reconciliation and upheld the addition for the closing stock of work-in-progress with directions to avoid double taxation in the subsequent year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>