<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 436 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57323</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the initiation of proceedings under Section 148 of the IT Act was justified as there was a reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. However, the addition of Rs. 8,54,764 on account of interest receivable from M/s Arihant Cotsyn Ltd. was deemed unwarranted as the interest income did not accrue in the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleted the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:00:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 436 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57323</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the initiation of proceedings under Section 148 of the IT Act was justified as there was a reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. However, the addition of Rs. 8,54,764 on account of interest receivable from M/s Arihant Cotsyn Ltd. was deemed unwarranted as the interest income did not accrue in the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleted the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>