<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 222 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the appeal and cross-objection filed by the assessee. The CIT(A)&#039;s decisions were upheld, reducing the additions made by the AO on account of unexplained investments in properties for various assessment years. The Tribunal found the assessee provided sufficient evidence to explain the investments, leading to the dismissal of all appeals and cross-objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 222 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the appeal and cross-objection filed by the assessee. The CIT(A)&#039;s decisions were upheld, reducing the additions made by the AO on account of unexplained investments in properties for various assessment years. The Tribunal found the assessee provided sufficient evidence to explain the investments, leading to the dismissal of all appeals and cross-objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>