<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 434 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57315</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal regarding the addition of unexplained investment and the legality of reopening the assessment for the assessment year 1988-89. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal procedures and timelines in assessments, leading to the quashing of the assessment order and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 434 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57315</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal regarding the addition of unexplained investment and the legality of reopening the assessment for the assessment year 1988-89. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal procedures and timelines in assessments, leading to the quashing of the assessment order and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>