<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 207 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57314</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It confirmed the treatment of lease rent on trucks as partly revenue expenditure, allowed festival and anniversary expenses as business expenditures, and directed the AO to follow its earlier orders on lease charges paid to financiers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:33:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 207 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57314</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It confirmed the treatment of lease rent on trucks as partly revenue expenditure, allowed festival and anniversary expenses as business expenditures, and directed the AO to follow its earlier orders on lease charges paid to financiers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>