<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 221 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57310</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to allow adjustment for unabsorbed brought forward depreciation while computing book profit under s. 115J. It emphasized treating unabsorbed depreciation akin to unabsorbed loss for applying the provisions of s. 115J, citing relevant case law. The Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed based on legal principles and precedents, affirming the decision to consider unabsorbed depreciation in calculating book profit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:21:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 221 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57310</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to allow adjustment for unabsorbed brought forward depreciation while computing book profit under s. 115J. It emphasized treating unabsorbed depreciation akin to unabsorbed loss for applying the provisions of s. 115J, citing relevant case law. The Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed based on legal principles and precedents, affirming the decision to consider unabsorbed depreciation in calculating book profit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>