<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 156 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57305</link>
    <description>Departmental appeals before the Tribunal were held not maintainable where the tax effect fell below the CBDT monetary threshold under Instruction No. 1903 dated 28 October 1992, as the appeal was filed after that instruction took effect. The Tribunal followed its earlier view on the same point and dismissed the appeal without examining the merits of the addition relating to alleged unrecorded purchases or the material referred to under section 133(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 156 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57305</link>
      <description>Departmental appeals before the Tribunal were held not maintainable where the tax effect fell below the CBDT monetary threshold under Instruction No. 1903 dated 28 October 1992, as the appeal was filed after that instruction took effect. The Tribunal followed its earlier view on the same point and dismissed the appeal without examining the merits of the addition relating to alleged unrecorded purchases or the material referred to under section 133(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>