<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 229 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the contributions from the wife and son were not loans but joint family efforts towards purchasing a house. It was determined that Section 269SS did not apply to these contributions, and the assessee had a reasonable belief, negating the penalty under Section 271D. As a result, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:36:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 229 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the contributions from the wife and son were not loans but joint family efforts towards purchasing a house. It was determined that Section 269SS did not apply to these contributions, and the assessee had a reasonable belief, negating the penalty under Section 271D. As a result, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>