<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 230 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57303</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal while dismissing the Departmental appeal. The disputes over annual property value, deduction under the IT Act, addition of enhanced rent from State Bank of India, and deduction of legal/litigation expenses were resolved. The Tribunal held that the legal expenses were of revenue nature as they were incurred to protect the business interest, allowing the full deduction claimed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 230 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57303</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal while dismissing the Departmental appeal. The disputes over annual property value, deduction under the IT Act, addition of enhanced rent from State Bank of India, and deduction of legal/litigation expenses were resolved. The Tribunal held that the legal expenses were of revenue nature as they were incurred to protect the business interest, allowing the full deduction claimed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>