<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 228 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not provide adequate time for the assessee to present its case, leading to a rushed assessment. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was deemed unjustified in rejecting additional evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to grant the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 228 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not provide adequate time for the assessee to present its case, leading to a rushed assessment. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was deemed unjustified in rejecting additional evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to grant the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>